It is currently Wed Apr 29, 2026 4:21 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic

Have you worn PPE with an arc rating above 40 cal/cm^2?
Yes - Please tell us the rating 24%  24%  [ 13 ]
No - I use 40 cal/cm^2 or less 69%  69%  [ 38 ]
PPE not required for my job 7%  7%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 55
Author Message
 Post subject: Have you worn PPE above 40 cal/cm^2?
PostPosted: Sun Feb 12, 2017 6:01 pm 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:00 pm
Posts: 1736
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
PPE is available with Arc Ratings that exceed 100 cal/cm^2. This weeks question,

Have you worn PPE with an arc rating above 40 cal/cm^2?

Yes - Please tell us the rating
No - I use 40 cal/cm^2 or less
PPE not required for my job


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Have you worn PPE above 40 cal/cm^2?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:00 am 
Plasma Level
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:08 am
Posts: 2178
Location: North Carolina
Does it count if I've got cotton underwear, followed by FR shirt and pants, followed by a 40 cal suit over the top of that? Our standard workwear is the typical ATPV 10 range and we haven't taken credit for or tested the combination of the 3 so technically I'm way higher but never treated it that way.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Have you worn PPE above 40 cal/cm^2?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 13, 2017 8:09 am 
Arc Level
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 10:01 am
Posts: 488
Location: Indiana
PaulEngr wrote:
Does it count if I've got cotton underwear, followed by FR shirt and pants, followed by a 40 cal suit over the top of that? Our standard workwear is the typical ATPV 10 range and we haven't taken credit for or tested the combination of the 3 so technically I'm way higher but never treated it that way.


Good points. I expect that is what most guys are wearing. Probably not wearing double balaclava's and face shields though.

_________________
SKM jockey for hire
PE in 17 states


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Have you worn PPE above 40 cal/cm^2?
PostPosted: Mon Feb 20, 2017 7:56 am 
Sparks Level
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:31 am
Posts: 238
Location: Port Huron, Michigan
I have not been in a situation where I personally needed to where clothing that exceeded 40 cal/cm2. At a prior location, the suit was rated for 46 cal and the actual equipment rating was around 42 cal, and I encouraged them to where that when necessary.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Have you worn PPE above 40 cal/cm^2?
PostPosted: Wed Mar 01, 2017 6:59 am 

Joined: Thu May 22, 2014 6:36 am
Posts: 1
We have 65 and 100 calorie suits available at the station. I have been required to wear both. Current Engineering provided arc flash calculations list one breaker at 74, one at 52 and several between 42 and 46.5. Also our procedure directs a default to 100 calorie suits if addressing an energized situation that has not been previously evaluated and no Engineer is available to perform calculations.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
© 2022-2025 Arcflash Forum / Brainfiller, Inc. | P.O. Box 12024 | Scottsdale, AZ 85267 USA | 800-874-8883