1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Arc Rating of Rubber Gloves

Discussion in 'Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)' started by C Chord, Mar 19, 2008.

  1. C Chord New Member

    NFPA 70E seems to imply that rubber gloves provide some form of arc protection. Does anyone know if there is a rating in Calories/cm associated with rubber gloves or if there is some glove that has an arc rating?
  2. acobb Well-Known Member

    C Chord,

    I don't think it is so much the rubber as it is the leather glove cover. Past that, I don't know of a rating for the leather. Keep in mind that the standards are designed to save the torso and head areas in an attempt to save a life. Injury is not avoided in all cases. The distances in the NESC are specifically stated to be to the body, not the arms or hands.

    Alan
  3. brainfiller Administrator

    I just saw a presentation by Salisbury this week at the Electrical Safety Workshop / Conference in Dallas. They have now tested rubber gloves and found the ratings are higher than I would expect. For example Class 0 gloves have a rating of 38 calories for black rubber and 7 calories for red. Class 2 is even higher with 94 calories for black and 34.6 for red. When you add leather protectors it goes up. Don't use these numbers I listed here for your study or compliance because they are from my notes. Contact Salisbury or other glove manufacturers to see what they have. Right now I understand that there is still not an "official" ATPV rating (arc thermal performance value) because there is not an official testing standard (yet) but they have done their own tests to arrive at these results:) .

Share This Page