1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

15 KV Padmounted Switch Arc Flash Analysis

Discussion in 'IEEE 1584 - IEEE Guide for Performing Arc-Flash Ha' started by kwb4387, Jan 26, 2010.

  1. kwb4387 New Member

    I am looking for some opinion on how a medium voltage padmounted switch should be approached related to an Arc Flash analysis.

    I believe that they would be considered as 'switchgear' with an 'Arc in Box Arrangement'. My concern is that modeling them in this way results in a category 0 in this particular system because of the fast clearing times of instantaneous overcurrent relaying and current limiting fuses upstream. I'm concerned that this low hazard rating may be incorrect or misrpresent the hazards.

    I know that these switches are 'dead front' construction but they also are bushing well types that include load break elbows that are also designed to be disconnected with a hotstick.

    Maybe I am just overly concerned having worked in electrical maintenance in process industries but I am afraid that the low category for this particular situation would be misintepreted and generalized for other medium voltage switching operations.

    Any opinions would be welcome.
  2. THE CABLE GUY Well-Known Member

    Sorry, guy I would need more data to help you with your issue.
  3. jghrist Well-Known Member

    You should never generalize a specific IE calculation for other medium voltage switchgear situations.

    Are you making an IE calculation or determining the category from the 70E task tables?

    If you are calculating IE, why in particular do you think that the IE calculation would be incorrect. If anything, I would think that being deadfront would make the calculations conservative. The working distance assumed in IEEE Std 1584 doesn't consider using hotsticks. IEEE Std 1584 also assumes than any 1-phase fault will develop into a 3-phase fault. This would be unlikely with dead front padmount switches.
  4. kwb4387 New Member

    I agree with you that an arc flash rating is indeed, specific to that piece of equipment.

    My worry is that others may generalize that work on this type of equipment is not of concern and become complacent.


    You also do have a valid point about the IEEE 1584 standard assuming a three phase fault.

    The more likely issue that i could see might be a problem with a cable or a load break elbow when placing it in a parking stand. This would most likely be a single line to ground fault.

Share This Page