1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

PPE and IE below 1.2

Discussion in 'Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)' started by haze10, Mar 10, 2008.

  1. haze10 Well-Known Member

    I need some clarification.

    When using the NFPA Matrix you have the option in some categories and some tasks to drop the PPE by one level.

    Notes
    [1] Maximum of 25 kA short circuit current available, 0.03 second (2 cycle) fault clearing time.
    [3] For <10 kA short circuit current available, the hazard/risk category required may be reduced by one number.

    This would of course assume that you meet the above requirements as cited in the notes. This would also allow you in some circumstances to drop to Level 0.

    Now, if we were calculating PPE with the analysis method using IEEE formulas, are there any situations in which you can employ Level 0? The NFPA table lists PPE level 1 with an upperlimit of 4 cal/cm2, but there is no listing for Level 0.

    So if you calculate an IE of say 0.05 cal/cm2 and the Ibf was less than 10K - are you still in Level 1?

    Along this same theme, the Arc Flash Boundary is the point at which IE is reduced to 1.2 cal/cm2. But at that point you have unqualified individuals who are dressed in polyester shirts. Does this make sense?
  2. bluenoser New Member

    The way that I look at it is that you can either use the NFPA matrix OR the IEEE calcs.

    So basically if you do the calculation with IEEE then you have to use the IE that it is calculating to determine the PPE. However if you simply use the matrix then you can do as you note. That said I don't think that this is necessarily the correct or safest way to do something.

    Most of the remote sites that I work on have a available fault level of 10kA or less, but the protection takes a long time to clear a fault which increases the IE dramatically.

    So no, it doesn't really make sense, but remember that the entire discussion on Arc Flash is new and growing, so this is something that I am sure will be addressed in the future.
  3. Gary B Well-Known Member

    I agree with Bluenoser: if IEEE calculations are used to determine arc flash energy level, that should be the minimum PPE used, regardless of other provisions.

Share This Page