1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Generic Labels for Single Phase

Discussion in 'Arc Flash Labels' started by Don't_wanna_burn, Oct 13, 2009.

  1. Don't_wanna_burn New Member

    Is it a common practice (or acceptable) to put generic lables on 480 Volt single phase load (5kW or less)? Also would apply to 120/240 volt panels.

    Using SKM for the AF studies and just am not sure that using the three phase is the correct thing to do with these loads. I

    Make a generic label - Category 0 with a 4' AF boundary? Or just not label at all?
  2. THE CABLE GUY Well-Known Member

    Personally, I would put a label on the equipment 120-480v single phase. You will find a lot of discussion on this subject if you do a search within this forum. I would model and post the AF value according to the company’s protocol. Some people use a 0 while others are using a HRC 1 to include a face shield that significantly reduces the possibility of a sever injury. Equipment type has a role also for me such as Panelboards, or machine electrical control enclosure. For me I consider the hazards such as area around the hazard, lighting condition, equipment duty, panel size, IE and in some cases I may increase the PPE to a higher level.

    The 4 foot boundary sounds reasonable to me by default. Remember no label gives you the right to work energized. The label is only a guide based on the knowledge we have today to PPE usage if you do work hot.

    Many companies are trying to get by with HRC 0 to eliminate the face shield. According, if you’re on contract or doing your own companies studies. A contract company will want to cover legal issues. While working (doing the study) within your company the severity of the issue is not so great. I do not use SKM but I would believe the same would apply to most software. I have heard that some software does come with a single phase fault I believe it is ArcPro or something like that. Incident energy or available fault current also would play a role in evaluating the HRC to the finite point.

    The warning label for shock boundaries and PPE in all cases above 50v should be posted so your going to label anyways.

    There is no standard that I am aware of. Create your policy, standards and company protocol and go with it until the authorty standard is updated. Training and the use of energized electrical work permits and the warning label satisfies you as complaint I would think.

Share This Page