1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

480V Main Disconnects - CB Operation

Discussion in 'Electrical Safety Practices' started by WJMan, Sep 30, 2009.

  1. WJMan New Member

    An arc flash analysis has been performed at one of our multiple-story facilities. As a result, many of the 480V disconnects on each floor were labeled with the 'DANGER - ENERGIZED WORK PROHIBITED' labels in accordance with NFPA 70E for components determined to be greater than 40cal.

    The maintenance employees responsible for the electrical facilities within the building are now questioning whether they can safely operate the CB disconnect which is located outside the disconnect enclosure. They believe operating a disconnect with doors closed is not considered energized work since no electrical conductors or circuit parts are exposed.

    The debate continues to whether operation of the disconnects can still be accomplished without deenergizing the entire building. Does anyone have any thoughts or clear guidance on what should be done in this particular scenario?
  2. Zog Well-Known Member

    They are wrong, unless you have arc rated switchgear operation and/or racking of breakers with the doors closed is considered energized work per the 70E, they use the phrase "interaction with equipment" in the definition and cite the task tables as examples.

    They can use remote operators to operate them from outside the arc flash boundary. That what most facilities are starting to do.
  3. Canuck01 Member

    Hazards over 40 cal

    Hello Zog
    Remote racking is a great way to remove the risk when racking but I am struggling with the Test portion of lockout. Testing will require the electrician to interact with the gear and be exposed to the potential arc hazard. any thoughts on how to deal with a +100 cal hazard when testing? Am I thinking about this all wrong??
  4. Zog Well-Known Member

    Good discussion on the testing part here. http://www.arcflashforum.com/showthread.php?t=673

Share This Page