1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Preprint proposals

Discussion in 'NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code' started by stevenal, Aug 13, 2009.

  1. stevenal Well-Known Member

  2. stevenal Well-Known Member

    Finally got a look, and I don't like what I see.

    I knew the low voltage table 1 was coming, but I did not know it would be referenced along with the other two tables from a single statement that requires a detailed study OR table use. Table 2 assumes rubber gloving, so it is inappropriate to use here where rubber gloving is not allowed. Table 3 uses much higher current values than we see. But a detailed analysis at the low voltage level is un-workable. We need to be able to use the tabulated values for low voltage while performing the study for voltages over 1000.

    And rule 410A3(b) allows synthetic fabric to be worn if it is FR only. I've seen the videos where this stuff drips and burns very well. These fabrics need to be arc rated, not just FR.

    Please help me get these rules changed before publication. http://standards.ieee.org/nesc/rp/welcome.html

    Thanks.
  3. brainfiller Administrator

    Stevenal
    Are you interested in setting up in virtual conference room 2 at the bottom of this forum to work on proposals with others? That is what we are doing in conference room 1 for NFPA 70E.
  4. stevenal Well-Known Member

    Brainfiller,

    Thanks for the offer. To late now for proposals for NESC 2012. Just hoping we can get some comments in on what has been proposed.
  5. acobb Well-Known Member

    But aren't the CP's available now until May 2010 for public comments or "interested parties" or am I confused again?

    On re-reading your post....Appears that is what you said to start with!

    So I guess the question is should we gather some comments on the CP's?

Share This Page