1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Lockout/Tagout practices

Discussion in 'Electrical Safety Practices' started by PAult, Aug 11, 2009.

  1. PAult Member

    Is zero voltage verification needed for all lockouts?

    Current procedure simplified example
    pump change
    -Pump is stopped
    -Disconnect is opened
    -Attempt to start pump from controls
    -Lock installed and work performed

    Since this lockout does not require any electrical work, do they need to verify that there is zero voltage to the pump motor? This would require a qualified electrical worker to verify.

    Thanks in advance!
  2. Capt Jim Member

    I believe that all conductors at the work location must be checked dead with the proper rated voltage detection device. In the process of this the person must use the correct "V" rated gloves, and wear all necessary PPE for the environment . That includes arc protection clothing. The only exception is when it is visibly grounded at the work location. If there is an exception for motors, or devices where access to the conductors is a problem, I would like to hear it. Good Question
  3. TxEngr Member

    Based on my experience, it is not necessary to do a voltage verification for a basic lockout where an electrical hazard will not be present. However, if an electrical hazard is present, then the conductors must be verified as being deenergized to confirm the electrically safe work condition.

    I have never particularly liked using the 'bump test' as the measure of a safe lockout even though it is acceptable. My main concern has been the presence of interlocks that could give you a false response to the bump test and then allow startup later. In the 2009 70E some verbage was added stating that drawings must be consulted to confirm that removal of an interlock will not cause sudden startup of the device. In my mind it's a lot easier just to pull the switch and verify an absence of voltage on the load side of the switch. Then it no longer matters what the interlocks are because once the switch is locked out, there is no power available. But many facilities lack enough qualified persons to do this type of verification (e.g. one multicraft mechanic per shift). So if you do the consult drawings thing to confirm interlocks that might create an unsafe condition, the bump test is fine.

    TxEngr

Share This Page