1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here
Create Your User Profile and Status Updates Welcome Message Arc Flash Forum has been Upgraded!

Breaker failure and LOTO

Discussion in 'NFPA 70E - Standard for Electrical Safety in the W' started by mascott, Jun 19, 2009.

  1. mascott New Member

    When performing the voltage test on a breaker for LOTO, what energy level is considered?

    Case 1: Assume the breaker was inadvertantly left open. You would use the energy level from the load side of the breaker.

    Case 2: Assume the breaker failed and one phase stayed closed in and will not open in case of and arc flash. You would use the energy level from the line side of the breaker.

    Obviously case 2 is more conservative. I just don't remember NFPA 70E talking about assuming one level of failure in the analysis. It just says to consider the conductor energized until placed in an electrically safe work condition.

    Thanks for any insight...
    mascott, Jun 19, 2009
    #1

  2. Zog Well-Known Member


    You assume the breaker is closed and will do its job. That is the scary thing is all arc flash studies are assuming the OCPD will work right, thats why they added the testing of OCPD'd per the 70B or ANSI/NETA MTS to the "Safety related maintenence practices" section of the 70E. Basicaly your analysis assumes the breakers will work right but your study is invalid if you dont test your breakers.
    Zog, Jun 20, 2009
    #2

Share This Page