1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Labelling Requirements when using the PPE Task Table

Discussion in 'Arc Flash Labels' started by haze10, Mar 25, 2009.

  1. haze10 Well-Known Member

    Art 130.3(C) says that labels have to be installed that indicate PPE level or IE. 130.7(9) says we can still use the PPE Task Table 130.7(C)(9) to determine HRC.

    If a company decides to follow the Table method of HRC, and does a 'mini' analysis to determine that all the parameters regarding fault current and clearing time are within the footnote limits - what then do you put on the label?

    You did not calculate the individual IE, and the PPE is based upon the task being done. So what does the label say?
  2. Vincent B. Well-Known Member

    "Use xx cal/cm^2 PPE at yy" working distance", with cal/cm^2 based on the HRC.
  3. haze10 Well-Known Member

    yeh, I thought that also, but its task specific.

    On a 480V MCC to check voltage is level 2*, to operate the starter doors open is level 1, to insert a bucket is level 4.

    It would seem to me the only correct way to do it is to say "See Table 130.7(c)(9), and if you want you could at @18" or 36" depending on voltage.

    You are not going to reference just one HRC value when it is task specific and any of the five may apply. And you certainly can't fit the whole table category on one small label.
  4. Vincent B. Well-Known Member

    The goal of that field label is to readily know what PPE is required to protect oneself. Referencing a table in a standard is probably not specific enough.

    You could probably post the highest HRC for the tasks which can be done on that equipment according to the table (excluding tasks for which you have a written and followed policy of "don't work live", so it's not always HRC 4).
  5. John Perrotti Member

    Labeling

    For using the Tabular Method, we have developed a label which includes the following information:
    Electrical Apparatus Type
    Flash Boundary
    Voltage
    Corresponding Tasks & Hazard Risk Category
  6. haze10 Well-Known Member

    It doesn't make sense. The code specifically grants me the option of following the Table. The table lists different HRC levels for different tasks. I certainly don't want to cite the 'highest'. Do you really recommend putting electricians in Level 4 suits so they can check voltage on a fuse clip in a MCC bucket?

    Does anyone have a sample of the label they use when following the task matrix. Do you list every task for that category.

    I can't find any guidance in the handbook on this. It would seem an obvious contradiction and I am surprised it was not explained in the code.
  7. haze10 Well-Known Member

    John,
    are you saying your label actually lists all the task options in the table, or do you condense it into something simple. Can you list the options for say a MCC and a Panelboard.
  8. John Perrotti Member

    Example of a label

    I've attached an example of a label. (I hope it attached)

    Attached Files:

  9. haze10 Well-Known Member

    thanks john, at least that makes sense to me. You list every HRC for all anticipated tasks. I wonder if NFPA fully contemplated the result of the requirement to post PPE on people using the tables. If they did, they didn't outline a good course of action. I think it would have been better to just say, "HRC as per Table 130 C9" on the label isntead of listing eveery task.

    It seems that the NFPA is trying to force everyone into a full analysis. That is going to be one tough financial nut for American business.
  10. Peter New Member

    How do you get default FPB

    John,

    I like your implementation of the Table label. We typically do IEEE for all main distribution (MV and LV adjustable devices and direct feeds) and Table for the rest (i.e. all the devices within the limited clearing times and currents). However, using the table method, how do you provide the FPB which you indicated as 48" in your sample label?
  11. John Perrotti Member

    Default FPD

    Article 130.3 (A) 1

    You can use a default boundary of 48" when certain conditions are met: 50 V to 600 V and a clearing time of 2 cycles and the available bolted fault current of 50kA .......(plus some more info)
  12. haze10 Well-Known Member

    The code said you had to list either the PPE Level or the IE. Didn't say anything about the AFB.
  13. John Perrotti Member

    Information on Lables

    You are correct - that is the minimum amount of information your label should have.

    The labels shown goes beyond the minimum information required.

Share This Page