1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here
Create Your User Profile and Status Updates Welcome Message Arc Flash Forum has been Upgraded!

Ground Fault Protection

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by WDeanN, Oct 25, 2007.

  1. WDeanN Well-Known Member

    The basic question is: Should ground fault protection be taken into account when performing an arc flash study?

    Most (MOST, not all) arcing faults will propagate to 3 phase to ground faults, and will probably be taken out with the ground fault detection (if it exists). So, should this be taken into account when calculating trip times?

    Currently, we do not look at this at our location, as I have yet to see anything on this, but it would make sense to use the ground fault clearing time.
    WDeanN, Oct 25, 2007
    #1

  2. Gary B Well-Known Member

    I use IEEE 1584 method without having deeply analyzed the reasoning behind this standard.

    I believe the standard does NOT include ground fault sensing as that might not represent the worst case exposure. In some cases a medium voltage fault will go phase to phase prior to tripping on ground fault pickup so that might be the rationale.
    Gary B, Oct 25, 2007
    #2

  3. brainfiller Administrator

    Right now the IEEE 1584 Calculations are based on 3 phase faults. They do not consider zero sequence impedance etc. required to estimate the line-ground currents. Maybe sometime in the future this might be considered but the current standard was based on a limited budget from several years ago so three phase is all we have.

    Yes, the concern was that a single phase arc could turn into a three phase event very quickly. I could see a ground fault device tripping if it was quick enough and trips before the fault goes to three phase but most ground fault devices have a minimum time delay of 6 cycles (0.1 seconds) so most people take the conservative route. Similar logic is used in suggesting that a local main might not be the limiting factor for an arc flash since the plasma could reach the line side terminals of the main and continue even if the main trips.

    Some day new tests and new interpretations might develop but for now, using three phase faults and phase devices seems to be the standard interpretation.
    brainfiller, Oct 27, 2007
    #3

Share This Page