1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Network protectors

Discussion in 'NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code' started by Rob Gray, Dec 11, 2008.

  1. Rob Gray New Member

    We're curious as to how other utilities are treating dead front protectors. Specifically, when a worker is opening a cabinet to a dead front protector, can this be considered as non-exposure to energized equipment?

    Rob
    robert.gray@avistacorp.com
  2. haze10 Well-Known Member

    I would vote 'YES'. With 'live break' or 'dead break' elbows there are no exposed energized parts. Without exposed lived parts, Arc Flash is not required. The low voltage side would be a different story.

    Of course, I would treat this the same way as entering a manhole with energized cables. There are live parts, but you need to be in FR PPE and tic trace for voltage to verify there are no cracks or leakage in cables - then you could remove FR.
  3. acobb Well-Known Member

    Rob,

    Not sure of the type of cabinet you are referencing. Can you be more specific?

    Alan
  4. Rob Gray New Member

    Network protector access

    Alan,

    The "cabinet" I was referring to, would probably be better described as the enclosure door. This is to a network protector, such as an Eaton CM52. The conductors are insulated and isolated in a composite resin frame. This is in contrast to the older protectors, where exposed conductors are accessible as soon as the door is opened.

    Thanks,
    Rob
  5. John Perrotti Member

    Approval

    Does the cabinet have any approval rating with the door open - with the secondary protection system?
  6. hester_aj New Member

    I work for a utility in the south and we wear the FR clothing ANYTIME we open or move the NP switch handle. We wear class 1 FR clothing as of right now. The company will be conducting studies on the secondary 2010 so who knows what calorie we will be wearing. We have GE CMD CM-22 and CM-52 netowrk protectors and we wear class 1. It doesnt matter if its dead front or not. While youre reading this thread do you know anysites that have people talking about network protectors. I have been trying to find some and cant locate anything.
  7. stevenal Well-Known Member

    I would consider opening a door to expose dead front parts to not be an interaction likely to cause a fault. Why was the door opened, though? Is there another action that follows?

    Of course secondary networks fall under the less than 1000 V 4 cal/cm^2 exception.
  8. hester_aj New Member

    the door could be opened for a number of reasons. i.e. maintence, inspections, son on and so forth. There has been accidents even fatalities on just racking in a piece of equipment some due to human error and some due to mechanisms.

Share This Page