1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

EasyPower Integrated Method

Discussion in 'Software for Arc Flash Studies' started by wbd, Dec 3, 2008.

  1. wbd Well-Known Member

    I was curious to see how many people that using EasyPower are using the Integrated method for finding the AFH when there are multiple sources. Per EasyPower, "this method takes into account the decreasing currents from motors and generators and also from multiple sources being switched out through protective devices tripping. The integrated method is the closest to a realistic scenario."
  2. McFlash New Member

    I have used it in the past and it does make a huge difference and model what is more realistic in the field. One of the nice things that it does as well, is it allows motor contribution to decay, depending on the facility you can have some large motor currents contributing. Also it keeps calculating at set intervals so when sources drop out that contribution is no longer being factored in. Typically the calculations use maximum magnitude fault for the longest duration of the last source clearing.
  3. brainfiller Administrator

    This is one of those areas where motor contribution modeling was not well defined in IEEE 1584. Until what I would consider this more realistic model was developed, motor contribution was a bit ackward. If you include it, often it would appear as sustained which is not correct and could effect the incdent energy. I would often try modeling incremental percentages of motor contribution just to see what happened.

    I talked directly with EasyPower about their model several months ago. They explained the decay method they are using which I thought was quite good. They take the more realistic approach of the dynamic nature of the decay so the initial event (t=0) has all of the motor contribution then it decays over several cycles.
  4. THE CABLE GUY Well-Known Member

    Yes. Great software at least for me.

Share This Page