1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Maximum bolted fault vs arcing current

Discussion in 'NFPA 70E - Standard for Electrical Safety in the W' started by Electric John, Sep 11, 2008.

  1. Electric John New Member

    Hi,

    in Annexe D, D.6 Calculation of Incidient Energy for a Flash Hazard Analysis the standard states that the arc flash analysis should be conducted using the maximum bolted fault and the minimum arcing value.

    I have no problem computing the bolted fault. But how do we compute the arcing fault. It states that for 480-V systems, the industry accepted 38% of Ibf.

    Does anyone uses this value? Is this a reference where I could find a method to compute the arcing current?

    Thanks

    John
  2. Zog Well-Known Member

    I use the 38% rule for field calculations only when using my 70E calculator on testing jobs where no study has been done. Basically you are using this to see if the 38% current will be below the INST trip of the feeder.

    These results will be very conservative, I wouldnt use this method for an actual study at a facility, it is a quick and somewhat sloppy method with questionable results.
  3. haze10 Well-Known Member

    John,
    Maybe I missed what you were asking, but in the Annex is the IEEE formula to calculate arcing current. You will see it as Ia and you need the Ibf, gap distance, voltage, etc. Taking a percentage like 38% is very estimate as Ia can often be much higher, especially in medium voltage apps.
  4. Zog Well-Known Member

    He is talking about the minimum requirements for the 70E method calcs on a 480V system. You do a 100% and a 38% of BF current calc, find your clearing time from the curves and ue the 70E equation. Very primitive method but it is acceptable to use, and failrl easy to do in the field in a pinch. Accuracy? Not so good, lots of assumptions made that fail in the "Safe" side so you usually waer more PPE than you need, OK for field jobs, not good for a facility study to put info on labels.
  5. haze10 Well-Known Member

    The other option that I never see mentioned is the IEEE method that is based on Ibf and molded case breaker size. Its a simple calc that gives you IE. Its in 1584 table at the back. Has anyone tried it.

Share This Page