1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

ArcPro and its Voltage Limitation

Discussion in 'Software for Arc Flash Studies' started by DanM, Jul 23, 2008.

  1. DanM New Member

    My utility (or myself and a few other protection engineers at my utility) decide to utilize ArcPro for our medium and high voltage arc flash analysis. After reviewing the literature that came with ArcPro I just realized ArcPro was only empirically verified up to an arc gap of 20 inches. If you apply a typical minimum air gap to provide sufficient insulation between two live parts, ArcPro real is limited to approximately 70Kv. I know the NESC tables go beyond 70Kv, and it is suggested that ArcPro was used to create the tables (someone decided to ignore the software’s limitation). Has anyone else used ArcPro for an arc gap beyond 20 inches? And if so do you feel the results were reasonable?
  2. DanM New Member

    Ignore my above statement

    You can ignore my above statement. I was originally looking at a more conservative standard to estimate the minimum distance between two live parts to avoid a flashover. I also assumed the worst case scenario and was applying the phase to phase voltage instead of the phase to ground voltage that was used to develop the NESC tables. If you apply the same criteria that was employed to develop the NESC tables (IEEE std 4 – 1995), ArcPro’s limitation is well beyond 70Kv: (345Kv / sqr(3) )/ 10Kv => 19.9 inches

Share This Page