1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Satisfying NESC 41

Discussion in 'NESC - ANSI C2 - National Electrical Safety Code' started by cnordquist, Jun 30, 2008.

  1. cnordquist New Member

    If I were to do an arc flash analysis of a decent sized R.E.C. distribution system (40 subs or so) would I be satisfying NESC 41 if I chose roughly 300 points throughout the system and assesed them, or would that not be enough? I'm trying to decide if it is necessary to all of the primary equipment (fuses, reclosers, VFI's) since I'll get different fault currents depending upon where that equipment is placed on the system.
  2. acobb Well-Known Member

    Nesc

    We are taking the approach that, since you could have personnel working on any part of an overhead system, checking selected points on the relay TCC from max to min circuit fault duty. If you are downstream from a fuse or recloser on 1 shot, you could use those curves since they should be faster than the substation breaker. You will probably notice that at levels of 150 to 200 % pickup, the energy can get quite high due to most inverse type curves requiring 5 to 10 seconds or more to clear at these levels.

    We are considering adding maintenance switches to invoke alt. settings which would lower the time and inst pickups for those cases where the energy levels are high and the necessary micro-processor relays exist.

    We are also considering using a max of 2 to 5 seconds for arc duration but are not comfortable using an arbitrary value yet.

    Hope it helps.
    Alan
  3. mls2 New Member

    Alan,

    We established an 8 cal/cm2 min rating for our clothing systems (you could pick 4) and established equivalent "relay type curves" for our MWD. We then did a coordination study using this curve againt our line devices and found the "miscoordiantions" i.e. exception areas. The choices then become increase the working distance or increase the clothng. For rubber gloving, we had no choice but to increase the clothing. Works for transmission lines also.

    Hope that helps,
    Marcia Eblen, PG&E Principal Grounding Engineer
  4. acobb Well-Known Member

    FR Clothing

    Marcia,

    So far I have been recommending a minimum of 8 cal clothing to our clients as well. On the high voltage (15 and 25 kV) distribution systems there are very few cases I see that even get to 5 or 6 cal levels. Most of the bus fault duties are in the 5 to 7 k range. Ground mounted equipment at 480 or 208 is a different animal and I am not at all comfortable with the minimum 4 cal in the NESC. Self contained polyphase meter bases I believe will be an issue as well.

    Thanks,
    Alan

Share This Page