1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Working Distance and Hands?

Discussion in 'Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)' started by basspro91, Jul 22, 2007.

  1. basspro91 New Member

    It looks like the calculations are based on the body being some distance away from the arc. i.e. working distance. What about the hands and arms? It looks like this could be a problem since the incident energy becomes much worse the closer you get.
  2. K. Boom New Member

    Yes you might not play the piano again. I understand the concern is survival and they have to draw the line somewhere. Incident energy varies as the inverse square of the distance from the arc so the closer you get, the problem grows exponentially. 70E just makes a statement about parts of the body closer to the arc might need additional protection and recommends leather glove protectors. Perhaps a PPE manufacturer such as Salisbury or Oberon might have something better.
  3. Safety Guy New Member

    The distance issue is why remote racking of breakers is a good idea. I keeps you out of the "line of fire" in case there is an event while racking in the breaker. Same idea with hot sticks. Put as much distance between you and the potential arc flash source.
  4. Gary B Well-Known Member

    It seems that most of the PPE, for which the calcs are designed, focuses on the body trunk and face etc. which would be at the working distance from arc source. The arc blast suits do not always include gloves and it seems leather gauntlet gloves are a common practice. By its own disclaimers the intent of NFPA is to reduce burns not eliminate them. I suspect that if working distance is measured to the hands (on 480V gear which often has exposed conductors near the front) the PPE will become very restrictive.

    (just some observations and opinions)

    Gary B
  5. Greg Cross New Member

    Good FR Gloves?

    Does anyone have any experience with gloves that have a good FR rating and that allows you to do the work without making things too difficult? NFPA 70E references leather protectors etc. but have gloves gotten better?

    Thanks!
  6. Zog Well-Known Member

    Rubber gloves with leather protection offer all the arc flash protection you would ever need, problem is there is not an ASTM standard for establishing a rating for rubber gloves and leather protectors because too much depends on the condition and cleanliness of the leather.

    See Jims post in this section for more info on the estimated ATPV of rubber gloves alone.

Share This Page