1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

MCC Bucket Line/Load Side

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by RJohnson, Jul 21, 2010.

  1. RJohnson New Member

    For the starter buckets in a 480V MCC, should the arc flash calculations be done on the MCC bus and then these numbers would apply to all buckets? Or should each bucket be handled individually using the PD in each bucket. Essentially creating a new bus for each bucket on the load side of its' breaker?
  2. cbauer Well-Known Member

    In the studies that I have done, I used the one Cat for the whole MCC.
  3. JBD Well-Known Member

    It is unlikely that a significant arc flash will be confined to a single bucket and not propagate to the vertical bussing in each compartment, so almost of my customers 'use' a single arc flash value for an entire MCC. Some customers consider an integral MCC main device to be sufficiently barriered from the rest of the MCC that it will have time to perform its function prior to becoming engulfed by an arc in a bucket. But no customer wants to calculate values for each individual bucket.
  4. RJohnson New Member

    Thanks for the replies. What about for the main breaker? It seems that for the main breaker, you would have to go to the upstream device in order to calculate the arc flash for the space the main breaker is in. Since when you open the door for the main breaker compartment, the line side of the breaker could be exposed. Depending on what's upstream, the potential incident energy at this point could exceed 40 cal/cm2. Should arc flash calculations for the main breaker use the upstream PD?
  5. arcflash71 Member

    For MCCs like you describe I use the following approach:

    1 Label on the MCC main or incoming line cubicle with incident energy based on the upstream OCPD clearing time.

    Generic labels on each bucket that refer to the main or incoming line cubicle arc flash data. That way if you have to relabel there is only one change per MCC.
  6. mountaineer Member

    MCC Labels

    I have a situation where the customer has an MCC with no main and the bus is a Cat 1. There are a few 10 hp motors but most of the loads are circuit breakers to control panels that feed small motors (1/2 to 2 hp), small starter for 2hp loads, or CB's for 4kw unit heaters. I'm guessing it would be best to model each load individually? I know they can be modelled as a lump load but then I wouldn't have the protective device/bus hazard category for labels. Any thoughts or suggestions?
  7. arcflash71 Member

    If you have cable and breaker data then it makes sense to model the loads.
  8. Robertefuhr Member

    Yes, the main bus numbers should be used for each bucket. This is because the line side of the bucket disconnect has almost the same energy level as the MCC Main bus.

Share This Page