1. Create Your User Profile and Status Updates

    Arc Flash Forum members are invited to create a user profile. Let others know who you are, what you do and even add a picture or avatar of yourself. What are you up to? Let people in the arc flash and electrical safety community know with "status updates"!
  2. Welcome to the All New Arc Flash Forum

    Arc Flash Forum is a community where we help each other learn about arc flash and electrical safety. There is still much to be learned about arc flash, standards, PPE, studies and more and We need your HELP!

    If you have good information about Arc Flash - Post It! If you have a question about Arc Flash - Post It! If you can provide answers to Arc Flash questions - Post it!

    Sign up as a today member! Feel free to link to this site www.arcflashforum.com. Tell your friends. We want to help everyone be safe in the workplace!
  3. Bigger and Better!

    As you have no doubt noticed, the forum has been through quite an upgraded and looks and feels very nice! There are loads of new features and ways in which this site can now be even more useful to the community in learning about Arc Flash and Electrical Safety.

    Create your detailed user profile
    Add a profile photo of yourself
    Like the forum on Facebook
    "Like" users' posts
    Publish your articles in the library
    ...and much, much more!

    Learn More About the New Features Here

Category 0 vs Category 1

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by mountaineer, Jul 2, 2010.

  1. mountaineer Member

    I have completed an arc flash study for a 240v 3 phase system. The results are primarily Category 0. Bolted fault currents of 4.4ka, arcing currents 2.6ka, with quick clearing times. My concern is the difference in the software result of Category 0 and how it compares to table 130.7 C9 in 70E. For example, the table for a 240 volt panelboard shows some tasks at Cat 0 but to remove a bolted cover a Cat 1.

    Any suggestions on how to interpret these differences?

    Thanks for your help.
  2. Zog Well-Known Member

    The tables make a bunch of assumptions and become void after you have done the analysis.
  3. JBD Well-Known Member

    Yes, ignore the tables once you have performed an analysis and have the actual incident energy levels.
  4. mountaineer Member

    Thank you for your replies. My brain can't seem to get past a Category 0 label for taking off a bolted cover while energized. Seems like a false sense of security.

    I guess if the employees are properly trained they understand that Category 0 does not mean zero hazard.
  5. JBD Well-Known Member

    Very important point.

    And of course, your work practices can be more restrictive than the bare minimum. For example, our service reps are to dress in Cat 2 when removing covers.
  6. hillbilly New Member

    We do the same, in order to avoid confusion, we require a minimum Cat 2 where Cat 1 is acceptable, and at any time live parts are exposed, whether by unbolting or opening a hinged enclosure.
  7. mountaineer Member

    In cases where the company's work practices require a higher hazard category than the study, how do you label the equipment? Do you print the label as a cat 0 based on the software calcs or do you label it a cat 2 based on work practices? I was checking around in etap to see if it is possible to force a higher category to print with the real calculated data. Haven't seen this function so far.
  8. cbauer Well-Known Member

    We have a minimum Cat 2 level on our equipment. In SKM and ESA you can force the Cat level to whatever number you want. We print our labels with the Cat 2 being the lowest allowable PPE.
  9. mountaineer Member

    Thanks for the info. I'll keep looking at the software then. Must be in there somewhere.
  10. JBD Well-Known Member

    In SKM V6.5xxx it is one of the Options available on the Arc Flash results screen.
  11. mountaineer Member

    Found it! Thank you.

Share This Page